[71]
"In my opinion the consuls, Publius Claudius and
Lucius Junius, who set sail contrary to the auspices,
were deserving of capital punishment; for they should
have respected the established religion and should
not have treated the customs of their forefathers
with such shameless disdain. Therefore it was a
just retribution that the former was condemned by
a vote of the people and that the latter took his own
life. ' Flaminius,' you say,' did not obey the auspices,
therefore he perished with his army.' But a year
later Paulus did obey them; and did he not lose his
army and his life in the battle of Cannae? Granting
that there are auspices (as there are not), certainly
those which we ordinarily employ—whether by the
tripudium or by the observation of the heavens—
are not auspices in any sense, but are the mere
ghosts of auspices.1
34. "'Quintus Fabius, I wish you to assist
me at the auspices.' He answers, ' I will.' (In our
forefathers' time the magistrates on such occasions
used to call in some expert person to take the
[p. 453]
auspices—but in these days anyone will do. But
one must be an expert to know what constitutes ' silence,' for by that term we mean 'free
of every augural defect.'
1 Cicero now proceeds to illustrate his point by giving the empty formulae used by the magistrates in taking the auspices. He represents himself as the celebrant and addresses his assistant, the augur, as “Quintus Fabius”— the name of any free man you please and as indefinite and impersonal as “John Doe,” or “Richard Roe.”
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.