[17]
What will you say, if, besides, I defend the act of the people, O Laterensis,
and prove that Cnaeus Plancius did not creep by underhand means to that
honour, but that he arrived at it by the regular course which has at all
times been open to men born in this equestrian rank of ours; can I, by this
argument expunge from your speech the comparison between you two, which
cannot be handled without an appearance of insult, and can I thus bring you
at last to the merits of the case itself and of your accusation? If, because
he is the son of a Roman knight he ought to have been inferior to you, all
the rest who were candidates at the same time with you were the sons of
Roman knights. I say no more: but this I do wonder at, why you should be
angry with this man above all the rest who was the furthest removed from
you. In truth, if, at any time, as is sometimes the case, I am pushed about
in the crowd, I do not find fault with that man who is on the
very crown of the Via Sacra, when I am pushed up against the arch of Fabius;
but with him who was against me and pushes me. But you are not angry with
Quintus Pedius, a very gallant man; nor with Aulus Plotius,1 whom I see here, a most accomplished
citizen, and my own intimate friend; but you think yourself defeated by him
who has also defeated them, rather than by those who were nearest yourself
in the number of votes, and who therefore pressed more immediately on you.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
1 Aulus Plotius was, however, the other aedile elect, as Plancius's colleague.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.