[134]
For I think
that I ought not to pass over the instance of that most eminent and most illustrious man,
Publius Africanus; who, when he was censor, and when Caius Licinius Sacerdos had appeared on
the register of the knights, said with a loud voice, so that the whole assembly could hear
him, that he knew that he had committed deliberate perjury and that if any one denied it, he
would give him his own evidence in support of this assertion. But when no one ventured to deny
it, he ordered him to give up his horse. 1 So that he, with whose decision the Roman people and foreign
nations had been accustomed to content themselves, was not content with his own private
knowledge as justifying him in branding another with ignominy. But if Habitus had been allowed
to do this, he would have found it an easy matter to have resisted those very judges
themselves, and the false suspicion, and the odium excited in the breasts of the people
against him.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
1 “If the censors considered a knight unworthy of his rank, they struck him off of the list of knights, and deprived him of his horse, or ordered him to sell it, with the intention, no doubt, that the person thus degraded should refund to the state the money which had been advanced to him for its purchase. (Niebuhr, Hist. of Rome, vol. i. p. 433.)”—Smith, Dict. Ant. p. 895, v. Equites.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.