[94]
possedit enim
Caecina, recuperatores; et id, tametsi extra causam est,
percurram tamen brevi ut non minus hominem ipsum quam
ius commune defensum velitis. Caesenniam possedisse
propter usum fructum non negas. qui colonus habuit
conductum de Caesennia fundum, cum idem ex eadem
conductione fuerit in fundo, dubium est quin, si Caesennia
tum possidebat, cum erat colonus in fundo, post eius
mortem heres eodem iure possederit? deinde ipse Caecina
cum circuiret praedia, venit in istum fundum, rationes a
colono accepit.
Click on a word to bring up parses, dictionary entries, and frequency statistics
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.