[73]
That very witness of yours who dared to
say “that he had been seen to do . . .” in a case where he could by no
possibility know even of what the man was accused—even he would not venture to
decide that a dowry was due to a husband which the woman had promised without the consent of
her trustee. Oh admirable principle, and worthy of being maintained by you on this account, O
judges!
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.