16.
In the whole of this method of fighting since the engagement took place under the
eyes of all and before the camp, it was perceived that our men, on account of
the weight of their arms, inasmuch as they could neither pursue [the enemy when]
retreating, nor dare quit their standards, were little suited to this kind of
enemy; that the horse also fought with great danger, because they [the
Britons] generally retreated even designedly, and, when they
had drawn off our men a short distance from the legions, leaped from their
chariots and fought on foot in unequal [and to them advantageous] battle. But
the system of cavalry engagement is wont to produce equal danger, and indeed the
same, both to those who retreat and to those who pursue. To this was added, that
they never fought in close order, but in small parties and at great distances,
and had detachments placed [in different parts], and then the one relieved the
other, and the vigorous and fresh succeeded the wearied.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.