[1052b]
[1]
But we must recognize that the
questions, "What sort of things are called one?" and "What is
essential unity, and what is the formula?" must not be taken to be the
same. "One" has these
several meanings, and each thing to which some one of these senses
applies will be one; but essential unity will have now one of these
senses and now something else, which is still nearer to the
term one, whereas they are nearer to its
denotation . This is also true of "element" and "cause,"
supposing that one had to explain them both by exhibiting concrete
examples and by giving a definition of the term. There is a sense in which fire is an
element (and no doubt so too is "the indeterminate"1 or some other similar thing, of its own
nature), and there is a sense in which it is not; because "to be fire"
and "to be an element" are not the same. It is as a concrete thing and
as a stuff that fire is an element; but the term "element" denotes
that it has this attribute: that something is made of it as a primary
constituent. The same is
true of "cause" or "one" and all other such terms.Hence "to be one" means "to be indivisible" (being
essentially a particular thing, distinct and separate in place or form
or thought), or "to be whole and indivisible"; but especially "to be
the first measure of each kind," and above all of quantity; for it is
from this that it has been extended to the other categories.
[20]
Measure is that by which quantity is known,
and quantity qua quantity is known either by
unity or by number, and all number is known by unity. Therefore all
quantity qua quantity is known by unity, and
that by which quantities are primarily known is absolute
unity.Thus unity is
the starting point of number qua number. Hence
in other cases too "measure" means that by which each thing is
primarily known, and the measure of each thing is a unit—in
length, breadth, depth, weight and speed.(The terms "weight" and "speed" are common to
both contraries, for each of them has a double meaning; e.g., "weight"
applies to that which has the least amount of gravity and also to that
which has excess of it, and speed to that which has the least amount
of motion and also to that which has excess of it; for even the slow
has some speed, and the light some weight.) In
all these cases, then, the measure and starting-point is some
indivisible unit (since even in the case of lines we treat the
"one-foot line" as indivisible). For everywhere we require as our
measure an indivisible unit; i.e., that which is simple either in
quality or in quantity.Now where it seems impossible to take away or add, there the measure
is exact.
1 The reference is undoubtedly to Anaximander.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.