This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
View text chunked by:
- bekker page : bekker line
- book : chapter : section
to someone else. But nevertheless it would
doubtless be agreed that anyone who wishes to make himself a professional and a man of
science must advance to general principles, and acquaint himself with these by the proper
method: for science, as we said, deals with the universal.
[17]
So presumably a man who wishes to make other people better
(whether few or many) by discipline, must endeavor to acquire the
science of legislation—assuming that it is possible to make us good by laws. For
to mold aright the character of any and every person that presents himself is not a task
that can be done by anybody, but only (if at all) by the man with
scientific knowledge, just as is the case in medicine and the other professions involving
a system of treatment and the exercise of prudence.
[18]
Is not then the next question to consider from whom or how the science of legislation can
be learnt? Perhaps, like other subjects, from the experts, namely the politicians; for we
saw1 that legislation who is a
branch of political science. But possibly it may seem that political science is unlike the
other sciences and faculties. In these the persons who impart a knowledge of the faculty
are the same as those who practice it, for instance physicians and painters; but in
politics the sophists, who profess to teach the science,
1 See 6.8.2.