This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
View text chunked by:
- bekker page : bekker line
- book : chapter : section
who was
nicknamed the filial for his devotion to his father, for he was thought to carry it to the
point of infatuation—) : well then, there cannot be any actual Vice in
relation to these things, because, as has been said, each of them is in itself desirable
by nature, although excessive devotion to them is bad and to be avoided.
[6]
And similarly there cannot be Unrestraint either, since that is not
merely to be avoided, but actually blameworthy; though people do use the term in these
matters with a qualification— ‘unrestraint in’ whatever it
may be—because the affection does resemble Unrestraint proper; just as they
speak of someone as a bad doctor or bad actor whom they would not call simply
‘bad.’ As therefore we do not call bad doctors and actors bad men,
because neither kind of incapacity is actually a vice, but only resembles Vice by analogy,
so in the former case it is clear that only self-restraint and lack of restraint in regard
to the same things as are the objects of Temperance and Profligacy are to be deemed
Self-restraint and Unrestraint proper, and that these terms are applied to anger only by
analogy; and so we add a qualification, ‘unrestrained in anger,’ just
as we say ‘unrestrained in the pursuit of honor’ or
‘gain.’ 5.
Besides those things however which are naturally pleasant, of which some are pleasant
generally and others pleasant to particular races of animals and of men, there are other
things, not naturally pleasant, which become pleasant either as a result of arrested
development or from habit, or in some cases owing to natural depravity. Now corresponding
to each of these kinds of unnatural pleasures we may observe a related disposition of
character.
[2]
I mean bestial characters, like the creature in woman's form1
that is said to rip up pregnant females and devour their offspring, or certain savage
tribes on the coasts of the Black Sea, who are alleged to delight in raw meat or in human
flesh, and others among whom each in turn provides a child for the common banquet2; or the reported depravity of Phalaris.3
[3]
These are instances of Bestiality. Other unnatural
propensities are due to disease, and sometimes to insanity, as in the case of the madman
that offered up his mother to the gods and partook of the sacrifice, or the one that ate
his fellow slave's liver. Other morbid propensities are acquired by habit, for instance,
plucking out the hair, biting the nails, eating cinders and earth, and also sexual
perversion. These practices result in some cases from natural disposition, and in others
from habit, as with those who have been abused from childhood.
[4]
When nature is responsible, no one would describe such persons as
showing Unrestraint, any more than one would apply that term to women because they are
passive and not active in sexual intercourse; nor should we class as Unrestraint a morbid
state brought about by habitual indulgence.
[5]
Now these various morbid dispositions in themselves