This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
View text chunked by:
- bekker page : bekker line
- book : chapter : section
1.
[9]
Again, as the unjust man is one who takes the larger share, he will be unjust in respect
of good things; not all good things, but those on which good and bad fortune depend. These
though always good in the absolute sense, are not always good for a particular person. Yet
these are the goods men pray for and pursue, although they ought not to do so; they ought,
while choosing the things that are good for them, to pray that what is good absolutely may
also be good for them.1.
[10]
The unjust man does not however always choose the larger share: of things that, speaking
absolutely, are bad he chooses the smaller share; but nevertheless he is thought to take
more than his due, because the lesser of two evils seems in a sense to be a good, and
taking more than one's due means taking more than one's due of good. 1.
[11]
Let us call him
‘unfair,’ for that is a comprehensive term, and includes both taking
too much of good things and too little of bad things.1
1.
[12]
Again, we saw that the law-breaker is unjust and the law-abiding man just. It is
therefore clear that all lawful things are just in one sense of the word, for what is
lawful is decided by legislature, and the several decisions of the legislature we call
rules of justice. 1.
[13]
Now
all the various pronouncements of the law aim either at the common interest of all, or at
the interest of a ruling class determined either by excellence or in some other similar
way; so that in one of its senses the term ‘just’ is applied to
anything that produces and preserves the happiness, or the component parts of the
happiness, of the political community.1.
[14]
But the law also prescribes certain conduct: the conduct
1 Here some mss. add ‘Also a law-breaker, for this, law-breaking or else unfairness, includes all injustice and is a common term for all injustice.’