This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
View text chunked by:
- bekker page : bekker line
- book : chapter : section
for instance, Is this object a
loaf? or, Is this loaf properly baked? for these are matters of direct perception.
Deliberation must stop at the particular fact, or it will embark on a process ad infinitum.3.
[17]
The object of deliberation and the object of choice are the same, except that when a
thing is chosen it has already been determined, since it is the thing already selected as
the result of our deliberation that is chosen. For a man stops enquiring how he shall act
as soon as he has carried back the origin of action to himself, and to the dominant
part1 of himself, for it is this part that chooses. 3.
[18]
This maybe illustrated by the ancient
constitutions represented in Homer: the kings used to proclaim to the people the measures
they had chosen to adopt.3.
[19]
As then the object of choice is something within our power which after deliberation we
desire, Choice will be a deliberate desire of things in our power; for we first
deliberate, then select, and finally fix our desire according to the result of our
deliberation.3.
[20]
Let this serve as a description in outline of Choice, and of the nature of its objects,
and the fact that it deals with means to ends.4.
Wishes, on the contrary, as was said above,2 are for ends. But while some hold that what is wished for3 is the good, others think it is what appears to be good.
[2]
Those however who say that what is wished for is the
really good, are faced by the conclusion, that what a man who chooses his end wrongly
wishes for is not really wished for at all; since if it is to be wished for, it must on
their showing be good, whereas in the case assumed it may so happen that the man wishes
for something bad.
[3]
And those on the other hand who say that what appears
good is wished for, are forced to admit that there is no such thing as that which is by
nature wished for, but that what each man thinks to be good is wished for in his case; yet
different, and it may be opposite, things appear good to different people.
[4]
If therefore neither of these views is satisfactory, perhaps we should say that what is
wished for in the true and unqualified sense is the good, but that what appears good to
each person is wished for by him; and accordingly that the good man wishes for what is
truly wished for, the bad man for anything as it may happen (just as in the case
of our bodies, a man of sound constitution finds really healthy food best for his health,
but some other diet may be healthy for one who is delicate; and so with things bitter4 and sweet, hot, heavy, etc.). For
the good man judges everything correctly; what things truly are, that they seem to him to
be, in every department5
[5]
for the noble and the pleasant have a special form
corresponding to each of the faculties of our nature, and perhaps what chiefly
distinguishes the good man is that he sees the truth in each kind, being himself as it
were the standard and measure of the noble and pleasant. It appears to be pleasure that
misleads the mass of mankind; for it seems to them to be a good, though it is not,
1 i.e., the intellect or reason, which chooses a line of action for the individual, as the Homeric monarch chose a policy for his kingdom.
2 Cf. 2.9.
3 The inherent ambiguity of the Greek verbal adjective form causes some confusion in this chapter between what is and what ought to be wished for, the desired and the desirable.
4 i.e., things really bitter, etc. seem so to a healthy man, but not in some cases to an invalid.
5 i.e., in each department of character and conduct.