Hide browse bar Your current position in the text is marked in blue. Click anywhere in the line to jump to another position:
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
View text chunked by:
- bekker page : bekker line
- book : chapter : section
Table of Contents:
[5]
Again, these thinkers' refutation of the argument from the converse appears equally
unsound. They pain say, if pain is bad, it does not follow therefore that pleasure is
good: for an evil can also be opposed to an evil and to a thing that is neither good nor
evil: a statement which is indeed sound enough, but which does not apply to the things in
question. If both pleasure and pain were in the class of evils, both would be also of
necessity things to be avoided, and if in the class of things neutral, neither ought to be
avoided, or they ought to be avoided alike; but as it is we see men avoid pain as evil and
choose pleasure as good; it is therefore as good and evil that they are opposed.
Aristotle in 23 Volumes, Vol. 19, translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd. 1934.
The Annenberg CPB/Project provided support for entering this text.
Purchase a copy of this text (not necessarily the same edition) from Amazon.com
show
Browse Bar
hide
Places (automatically extracted)
View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.
Download Pleiades ancient places geospacial dataset for this text.
hide
Search
hideStable Identifiers
hide
Display Preferences