[510d]
from these, and pursuing the
inquiry from this point on consistently, conclude with that for the
investigation of which they set out.”
“Certainly,” he said, “I know that.”
“And do you not also know that they further make use of the
visible forms and talk about them, though they are not thinking of them but
of those things of which they are a likeness, pursuing their inquiry for the
sake of the square as such and the diagonal as such, and not for the sake of
the image of it which they draw1?
1 Cf. 527 A-B. This explanation of mathematical reasoning does not differ at all from that of Aristotle and Berkely and the moderns who praise Aristotle, except that the metaphysical doctrine of ideas is in the background to be asserted if challenged.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.