[389a]
to give names, but for him who may be called the name-maker; and he, it appears, is the lawgiver, who is of all the artisans among men the rarest.Hermogenes
So it appears.Socrates
See now what the lawgiver has in view in giving names. Look at it in the light of what has gone before. What has the carpenter in view when he makes a shuttle? Is it not something the nature of which is to weave?Hermogenes
Certainly.Socrates
Well, then, if the shuttle breaks while he making it, [389b] will he make another with his mind fixed on that which is broken, or on that form with reference to which he was making the one which he broke?Hermogenes
On that form, in my opinion.Socrates
Then we should very properly call that the absolute or real shuttle?Hermogenes
Yes, I think so.Socrates
Then whenever he has to make a shuttle for a light or a thick garment, or for one of linen or of wool or of any kind whatsoever, all of them must contain the form or ideal of shuttle, [389c] and in each of his products he must embody the nature which is naturally best for each?Hermogenes
Yes.Socrates
And the same applies to all other instruments. The artisan must discover the instrument naturally fitted for each purpose and must embody that in the material of which he makes the instrument, not in accordance with his own will, but in accordance with its nature. He must, it appears, know how to embody in the iron the borer fitted by nature for each special use.Hermogenes
Certainly.Socrates
And he must embody in the wood the shuttle fitted by nature for each kind of weaving.Hermogenes
True. [389d] Socrates
For each kind of shuttle is, it appears, fitted by nature for its particular kind of weaving, and the like is true of other instruments.Hermogenes
Yes.Socrates
Then, my dear friend, must not the law-giver also know how to embody in the sounds and syllables that name which is fitted by nature for each object? Must he not make and give all his names with his eye fixed upon the absolute or ideal name, if he is to be an authoritative giver of names? And if different lawgivers do not embody it in the same syllables, we must not forget this ideal name on that account; for different smiths do not embody the form in the same iron, [389e] though making the same instrument for the same purpose, but so long as they reproduce the same ideal,
So it appears.Socrates
See now what the lawgiver has in view in giving names. Look at it in the light of what has gone before. What has the carpenter in view when he makes a shuttle? Is it not something the nature of which is to weave?Hermogenes
Certainly.Socrates
Well, then, if the shuttle breaks while he making it, [389b] will he make another with his mind fixed on that which is broken, or on that form with reference to which he was making the one which he broke?Hermogenes
On that form, in my opinion.Socrates
Then we should very properly call that the absolute or real shuttle?Hermogenes
Yes, I think so.Socrates
Then whenever he has to make a shuttle for a light or a thick garment, or for one of linen or of wool or of any kind whatsoever, all of them must contain the form or ideal of shuttle, [389c] and in each of his products he must embody the nature which is naturally best for each?Hermogenes
Yes.Socrates
And the same applies to all other instruments. The artisan must discover the instrument naturally fitted for each purpose and must embody that in the material of which he makes the instrument, not in accordance with his own will, but in accordance with its nature. He must, it appears, know how to embody in the iron the borer fitted by nature for each special use.Hermogenes
Certainly.Socrates
And he must embody in the wood the shuttle fitted by nature for each kind of weaving.Hermogenes
True. [389d] Socrates
For each kind of shuttle is, it appears, fitted by nature for its particular kind of weaving, and the like is true of other instruments.Hermogenes
Yes.Socrates
Then, my dear friend, must not the law-giver also know how to embody in the sounds and syllables that name which is fitted by nature for each object? Must he not make and give all his names with his eye fixed upon the absolute or ideal name, if he is to be an authoritative giver of names? And if different lawgivers do not embody it in the same syllables, we must not forget this ideal name on that account; for different smiths do not embody the form in the same iron, [389e] though making the same instrument for the same purpose, but so long as they reproduce the same ideal,
