[27]
For whereas all clauses in
contracts which are open to dispute require a judicial decision, men of the
jury, those on the contrary which are admitted by both the contracting parties,
and concerning which there exist maritime agreements, are held by all men to be
final; and the parties are bound to abide by what is written. That these men,
however, have fulfilled not a single one of the provisions of the agreement, but
that from the very first they meditated fraud and purposed dishonest action has
been thus clearly proven against them by the depositions of witnesses and by
themselves.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.