[76]
The outstanding
difference you will find to be really this: under oligarchical government
everybody is entitled to undo the past, and to prescribe future transactions
according to his own pleasure; whereas the laws of a free state prescribe what
shall be done in the future, such laws having been enacted by convincing people
that they will be beneficial to those who live under them. Timocrates however,
legislating in a democratically governed city, has introduced into his law the
characteristic iniquity of oligarchy; and in dealing with past transactions has
presumed to claim for himself an authority higher than that of the convicting
jury.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.