And in general, Typhon is the prevailing power, as
both Plato and Aristotle insinuate. Moreover, the generative
[p. 119]
and salutary part of nature hath its motion towards
him, in order to procure being; but the destroying and
corruptive part hath its motion from him, in order to procure not-being. For which reason they call the former
part Isis, from going (
ἴεσθαι) and being borne-along with
knowledge, she being a kind of a living and prudent motion. For her name is not of a barbarous original; but,
as all the Gods have one name (
θεός) in common, and that
is derived from the two words,
θέων (
running) and
θεατός
(
visible); so also this very Goddess is both from motion
and science at once called Isis by us and Isis also by the
Egyptians. So likewise Plato tells us, that the ancients
called
οὐσία (
being)
ἰσία (
knowledge), as also that
νόησις (
intelligence) and
φρόνησις (
prudence) had their names given them
for being a
φορά (
agitation) and motion of
νοῦς (
mind), which
was then, as it were,
ἱέμενος and
φερόμενος (
set in motion and
borne-along); and the like he affirmeth of
συνιέναι (
to understand), that it was as much as to say ‘to be in commotion.’
1
Nay he saith, moreover, that they attribute the very names
of
ἀγαθόν (
good) and
ἀρετή (
virtue) to the ideas of
running
(
θέω) and of
ever-flowing (
ἀεὶ ῥέω)
2 which they imply; as likewise, on the other hand again, they used terms opposite to
motion by way of reproach; for they called what clogged,
tied up, locked up, and confined nature from agitation and
motion
κακία (
baseness or
ill motion),
ἀπορία (
difficulty or
difficult motion),
δειλία (
fearfulness or
fearful motion) and
ἀνία
(
sorrow or
want of motion).