previous next
42. Whilst the Argives were treating about this, the Lacedaemonian ambassadors, Andromedes and Phaedimus and Antimenidas, commissioners for receiving of Panactum and the prisoners from the Boeotians to render them to the Athenians, found that Panactum was demolished, and that their pretext was this: that there had been anciently an oath, by occasion of difference between the Athenians and them, that neither part should inhabit the place solely, but jointly both. But for the Athenian prisoners, as many as the Boeotians had, they that were with Andromedes received, convoyed, and delivered them unto the Athenians, and withal told them of the razing of Panactum, alleging it as rendered in that no enemy of Athens should dwell in it hereafter. [2] But when this was told them, the Athenians made it a heinous matter, for that they conceived that the Lacedaemonians had done them wrong, both in the matter of Panactum, which was pulled down and should have been rendered standing, and because also they had heard of the private league made with the Boeotians, whereas they had promised to join with the Athenians in compelling such to accept of the peace as had refused it. Withal they weighed whatsoever other points the Lacedaemonians had been short in, touching the performance of the articles, and thought themselves abused; so that they answered the Lacedaemonian ambassadors roughly and dismissed them.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

load focus Notes (C.E. Graves, 1891)
load focus Notes (Harold North Fowler)
load focus English (Benjamin Jowett, 1881)
load focus English (1910)
load focus Greek (1942)
hide References (27 total)
  • Commentary references to this page (15):
    • C.E. Graves, Commentary on Thucydides: Book 4, CHAPTER LXXXIII
    • C.E. Graves, Commentary on Thucydides: Book 4, CHAPTER LXXXVII
    • Harold North Fowler, Commentary on Thucydides Book 5, 5.18
    • Harold North Fowler, Commentary on Thucydides Book 5, 5.39
    • Harold North Fowler, Commentary on Thucydides Book 5, 5.39
    • Harold North Fowler, Commentary on Thucydides Book 5, 5.44
    • Harold North Fowler, Commentary on Thucydides Book 5, 5.46
    • Harold North Fowler, Commentary on Thucydides Book 5, 5.79
    • Harold North Fowler, Commentary on Thucydides Book 5, 5.87
    • Charles D. Morris, Commentary on Thucydides Book 1, 1.102
    • Charles D. Morris, Commentary on Thucydides Book 1, 1.106
    • Charles D. Morris, Commentary on Thucydides Book 1, 1.29
    • Charles F. Smith, Commentary on Thucydides Book 7, 7.18
    • Charles F. Smith, Commentary on Thucydides Book 7, 7.27
    • Charles F. Smith, Commentary on Thucydides Book 7, 7.31
  • Cross-references to this page (2):
    • Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography (1854), A´TTICA
    • Sir Richard C. Jebb, Selections from the Attic Orators, 1.63
  • Cross-references in general dictionaries to this page (10):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: