[11]
There is also a different form of comparison, which comes into play when both parties
claim the credit of some act, and yet another kind,
when the question is not as between two persons,
but as between two acts; that is to say, the
question is not which of the two committed an act,
but which of two acts was committed. Finally,
if the act and the identity of the author are both
[p. 53]
admitted, we may still raise the question of his
intention.
I shall now proceed to detail. As an example of
joint denial covering both the act and the identity
of the author we may take the following statements,
“I have not committed adultery,” “I have not
sought to establish myself as tyrant.” In cases of
murder or poisoning the denial is often divided as
follows:
Quintilian. With An English Translation. Harold Edgeworth Butler. Cambridge. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann, Ltd. 1922.
The Annenberg CPB/Project provided support for entering this text.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.