[57]
There is, however, another line of argument which may be drawn
from the enactment that the person condemned for
treason should be banished together with his
advocate. It seems almost impossible that in one
and the same case a son should incur a penalty,
[p. 41]
both if he appeared in his father's defence and if
he did not appear. Further, exiles are outlaws.
Therefore the letter of the law cannot conceivably apply to the advocate of the condemned
man.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.