[16]
But when
the reason given is itself disputable, we must
establish the certainty of the premises by which we
are proposing to prove what is uncertain. For
example, if our opponent says “You are not his
son” or “You are illegitimate” or “You are not his
only son”; or, again, “You are not his heir” or “The
will is invalid” or “You are not entitled to inherit”
or “You have co-heirs,” we must prove the validity
[p. 359]
of the reason on which we base our claim that the
property should be adjudicated to us.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.