[36]
“I have
noted, judges, that the speech for the prosecution
was divided into two parts: of these, the first seemed
to rest and in the main to rely on the odium, now
inveterate, arising from the trial before Junius,
while the other appeared to touch, merely as a
matter of form, and with a certain timidity and
diffidence, on the question of the charge of poisoning, though it is to try this point that the present
court has been constituted in accordance with the
law.” All this, however, is easier for the defender
than the prosecutor, since the latter has merely to remind the judge, while the former has to instruct him.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.