[10]
For he
thinks that the only statement of facts is that which
gives a general account of the charge before the
court. Yet he himself acknowledges that Cicero
employed the statement of facts in his defence of
Rabirius Postumus, in spite of the fact that Cicero
denies that any money came into the hands of
Rabirius (and this was the question at issue) and
gives no explanations relating to the actual charge in
his statement of facts.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.