previous next
57. Such statements, even if included in a eulogy, would indicate the unusual greatness of a soul which restricted distinctions to conformity with a democratic constitution, and they were made by an enemy and accompanied by censure. [2] To this Gracchus the younger of Scipio's two daughters —for the elder was betrothed to Publius Cornelius Nasica [p. 201]and beyond doubt by her father —was married, as all1 agree.2 [3] What is not certain is whether she was both betrothed and married after the death of her father, or whether the opinions are true, that Gracchus, when Lucius Scipio was being taken to prison and no one of his colleagues was coming to his assistance, swore that his feud [4??] with the Scipios continued as before and that he was doing nothing to curry favour, but that he would not permit the brother of Africanus to be put into that prison into which he had seen Publius Africanus thrusting kings and generals of the enemy. [5] The story goes on that the senate, which chanced to dine that day on the Capitoline,3 had risen up and begged that during the banquet Africanus should betroth his daughter to Gracchus. [6] When the contract had been duly made at this public ceremony and Scipio had returned home, he told his wife Aemilia that he had arranged a marriage for their younger daughter. When she, being irritated, as a woman would naturally be, that he had not consulted with her about [7??] the daughter of both of them, had added that not even if he were promising her to Tiberius Gracchus should the mother have been excluded from the deliberation, [8??] Scipio, they say, rejoicing at their harmony of opinion, replied that it was to Gracchus that he had betrothed her.4 However much at variance are these accounts of so great a man, they have seemed worthy of presentation.5

1 B.C. 187

2 They were the parents of the famous tribunes.

3 Probably in connection with some religious festival.

4 Whether this is anything more than a pleasant story which Livy had picked up somewhere or not, it is probably characteristic of the conduct of the Roman aristocracy at this period.

5 With this anecdote Livy concludes his parenthetical miscellany and returns to the narrative based on Valerius Antias: cf. the note to Iv. 10 above.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

load focus Notes (W. Weissenborn, H. J. Müller, 1873)
load focus Notes (W. Weissenborn, 1873)
load focus Notes (W. Weissenborn, H. J. Müller, 1911)
load focus Summary (English, Evan T. Sage, Ph.D., 1936)
load focus Summary (Latin, W. Weissenborn, H. J. Müller, 1911)
load focus Summary (Latin, Evan T. Sage, Ph.D., 1936)
load focus Latin (W. Weissenborn, H. J. Müller, 1911)
load focus English (William A. McDevitte, Sen. Class. Mod. Ex. Schol. A.B.T.C.D., 1850)
load focus English (Rev. Canon Roberts, 1912)
load focus Latin (W. Weissenborn, 1873)
load focus Latin (Evan T. Sage, Ph.D., 1936)
hide References (19 total)
  • Commentary references to this page (3):
    • Titus Livius (Livy), Ab urbe condita libri, erklärt von M. Weissenborn, books 35-38, commentary, 37.33
    • Titus Livius (Livy), Ab urbe condita libri, erklärt von M. Weissenborn, books 39-40, commentary, 39.4
    • Titus Livius (Livy), Ab urbe condita libri, erklärt von M. Weissenborn, books 43-44, commentary, 44.16
  • Cross-references to this page (9):
  • Cross-references in notes to this page (1):
  • Cross-references in general dictionaries to this page (6):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: