Titus Livius (Livy), The History of Rome, Book 2
D. Spillan, A.M., M.D., Ed.

61. A more turbulent year¹ [2] next followed, Lucius Valerius, Tiberius Aemilius being consuls, both by reason of the struggles between the different orders concerning the agrarian law, as well as on account of the trial of Appius Claudius; for whom, as a most active [3] opposer of the law, and as one who supported the cause of the possessors of the public land, as if a third consul, Marcus Duilius and Caius Sicinius appointed a day of trial.² Never before was an accused person so hateful to the commons brought to trial before the people; overwhelmed with [4] their resentment on his own account,³ and also on account of his father. The patricians too seldom made equal exertions in behalf of any one: “that the champion of the senate, and [p. 153]the assertor of their dignity, opposed to all the storm of the tribunes and commons, was exposed to the resentment of the commons, merely for having exceeded bounds in the contest.” Appius Claudius himself was the only one of the patricians who made light both of the tribunes and commons and his own trial. Neither the threats of the commons, nor the entreaties of the senate, could ever persuade him not only to change his garb, or address persons as a suppliant, but not even so far as to soften or relax any thing from the usual asperity of his style, when his cause was to be pleaded before the people. The expression of his countenance was the same; the same stubbornness in his looks, the same spirit of [6] pride in his language; so that a great part of the commons felt no less awe of Appius when arraigned, than they had felt of him when consul. He pleaded his cause once, and with the same spirit of an accuser which he had been accustomed to adopt on all occasions: and [7] he so far astounded both the tribunes and the commons by his intrepidity, that, of their own accord, they postponed the day of trial; then they allowed the matter to be protracted. Nor [8] was the time now very distant; before, however, the appointed day came, he dies of some disease; and when the tribunes of the people endeavoured to impede his funeral panegyric,⁴ the commons would not allow that the last day of so great a man should be defrauded of the usual honours; and they listened to the panegyric of him when dead with as patient ears, as they had listened to the charges brought against him when living, and attended his funeral in vast numbers.