[72]
Nor, O judges, am I at all moved by the accusation respecting Clodius. Nor am
I so insane, and so ignorant of, and inexperienced in, your feelings, as not
to be aware what your opinions are about the death of Clodius, concerning
which, if I were unwilling to do away with the accusation in the manner in
which I have done away with it, still I assert that it would have been
lawful for Milo to proclaim openly, with a false but glorious boast.
“I have slain, I have slain, not Spurius Maelius, who fell under
the suspicion of aiming at kingly power by lowering the price of corn, and
by squandering his own family estate, because by that conduct he was thought
to be paying too much court to the common people; not Tiberius Gracchus,
who, out of a seditious spirit abrogated the magistracy of his own
colleague; whose slayers have filled the whole world with the renown of
their name; but him” (for he would venture to name him when he had
delivered his country at his own risk) “who was detected in the
most infamous adultery in the most sacred shrine, by most noble women;
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.