[90]
You say that I was afraid of death. But I should think it wrong to accept
even immortality at the expense of the welfare of the republic; much less
should I be willing to die, if by that means I was to damage the
commonwealth. For as for those men who have given up their lives for the
sake of the state, (although you may say that I am talking foolishly,) I
have never considered that they had met with death so much as with
immortality. But if I had at that time fallen by the weapons and hands of
wicked men, the republic would for ever have lost the civil guardian of its
safety. Moreover, if any violence of disease, or if nature itself had
carried me off, still the resources of posterity would have been diminished,
because by my death the opportunity would have been lost of showing what
great zeal of the senate and people of Rome was to be exerted in retaining me. Should I, if I had
ever had any extravagant fondness for life, have challenged the weapons of
all those parricides in the month of December of the year of my consulship,
when, if I had remained quiet for twenty days longer, they would all have
fallen on the vigilance of other consuls? Wherefore, if fondness for life
when contrary to the interests of the republic is shameful, at all events a
desire for death in my case, which must have been accompanied with injury to
the state, would have been more shameful still.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.