[62]
You ask whether he is an eloquent man. At
all events, what is the next best thing to being so, he does not think
himself one. “Is he a lawyer?” As if there were any one
who complains that he has given him a false answer in a point of law. For
all such acts as that are open to criticism in the case of men who, after
they have professed an acquaintance with them, are unable to satisfy
people's expectations; not in the case of men who confess that they have
never paid any attention to those pursuits. What is usually required in a
candidate is virtue, and honesty, and integrity, not volubility of tongue,
or an acquaintance with any particular art or science. As we, when we are
procuring slaves, are annoyed if we have bought a man as a smith or a
plasterer, and find, however good a man he may be, that he
knows nothing of those trades which we had in view in buying him; but if we
have bought a man to give him charge of our property as steward, or to
employ him to look after our stock, then we do not care for any other
qualities in him except frugality, industry, and vigilance; so the Roman
people elects magistrates to be as it were stewards of the republic, and if
they are masters of some accomplishment besides, the people have no
objection, but if not, they are content with their virtue and innocence. For
how few men are eloquent; how few are skillful lawyers, even if you include
all those in your calculation who wish to be so! But if no one else is
worthy of honour, what on earth is to become of so many most virtuous and
most accomplished citizens?
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.