[3]
And, O judges, this beginning of my defence appears to me to suit most
especially with the youth of Marcus Caelius so that I should reply first to
those things which the accusers have advanced with the general view of
disparaging him and for the sake of detracting from his honour and
despoiling him of his dignity. His father was cast in his teeth on various
accounts,—at one time as having been a man of no great
respectability himself; at another, he was said to have been
treated with but little respect by his son. On the score of dignity, Marcus
Caelius, to those who know him and to the older men among us, is of himself,
without speaking, himself able easily to make a very sufficient reply, and
without my having any occasion to make any statement for him; but as for
those to whom he is not equally well known, on account of his great age,
which has now for some time hindered his mixing much with us in the forum,
let them think this: that whatever dignity can exist in a Roman
knight,—and certainly the very greatest may be found in that
body,—has always been considered, and is to this day considered,
to shine out in great lustre in the case of Marcus Caelius; and moreover it
is so considered, not only by his own relations and friends, but by every
one to whom he can possibly be known on any account whatever.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.