[125]
I say nothing about Gabinius. Why? Did not Lucius Munius,1 the most fearless and most excellent
of all men, consecrate your property by your own precedent? And if, because
you yourself are concerned, you say that that action ought not to be
ratified, did you in that splendid tribuneship of yours establish laws
which, the moment that they were turned against yourself, you repudiated,
though you made use of them to ruin other people? If that consecration be
legal, then what is there in your property which can be applied to other
than holy uses? Or has a consecration no power, while a dedication draws
with it the sanctions of religion? What then was the meaning of your
summoning that flute-player to be a witness? What was the object of your
brazier? What became of your prayers? What was the meaning of all your
old-fashioned expressions? Did you wish to lie, to deceive, to abuse the
divine reverence due to the immortal gods, in order to strike terror into
men? For if that act is once ratified—I say nothing about
Gabinius,—most certainly your house and whatever else you have is
consecrated to Ceres. But if that
was a joke of yours, what can be more impure than you who have polluted
every sort of religion by lies and adulteries?
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
1 Some editions read Mummius.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.