[48]
Nor, indeed, can I make out why you are angry with me. If it is because I am defending a man
whom you accusing, why should not I also be angry with you, who are accusing a man whom I am
defending? “I,” say you, “am accusing my enemy.” And I
am defending my friend. “But you ought not to defend any one who is being tried for
conspiracy.” On the contrary, no one ought to be more prompt to defend a man of whom
he has never suspected any ill, than he who has had many reasons for forming opinions about
other men. “Why did you give evidence against others?” Because I was
compelled. “Why were they convicted?” Because my evidence was believed.
“It is behaving like a king to speak against whomsoever you please and to defend
whomsoever you please.” Say, rather, that it is slavery not to be able to speak
against any one you choose and to defend any one you choose. And if you begin to consider
whether it was more necessary for me to do this or for you to do that, you will perceive that
you could with more credit fix a limit to your enmities than I could to my humanity.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.