[56]
And as these are weighty considerations, O judges, so is
this the most serious matter of all, that he has men for accusers who, instead of proceeding
to accuse him on account of their private enmity against him, have become his personal
enemies, being carried away by their zeal for their accusation. For, to say nothing of Servius
Sulpicius, who, I am aware, is influenced not by any wrong done by Lucius Murena, but only by
the party spirit engendered by the contest for honour, his father's friend, Cnaeus Postumius,
is his accuser, an old neighbour and intimate friend of his own, as he says himself; who has
mentioned many reasons for his intimacy with him, while he has not been able to mention one
for any enmity towards him. Servius Sulpicius accuses him, the companion of his
son,—he, by whose genius all the friends of his father ought to be only the more
defended. Marcus Cato accuses him, who, though he has never been in any matter whatever at
variance with Murena, yet was born in this city under such circumstances that his power and
genius ought to be a protection to many who were even entire strangers to him, and ought to be
the ruin of hardly any personal enemy.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.