[98]
Therefore, this decision in the case of Bulbus ought not to be any greater injury to this
cause, than those two which were mentioned by the prosecutor in the case of Publius Popillius
and Titus Gutta, who were prosecuted for corruption,—who were accused by men who had
themselves been convicted of bribery, and whom I do not imagine to have been restored to their
original position merely because they had proved that these other men also had taken money for
the purpose of influencing their decision, or because they proved to the judges that they had
detected others in the same sort of offence of which they had themselves been guilty; and
that, therefore, they were entitled to the rewards offered by the law. Therefore, I think that
no one can doubt that that conviction for bribery can in no possible way be connected with the
cause of Cluentius and with your decision.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
M. Tullius Cicero. The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, literally translated by C. D. Yonge, B. A. London. Henry G. Bohn, York Street, Covent Garden. 1856.
The National Endowment for the Humanities provided support for entering this text.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.