[154]
They said, that either the proper age for
offering themselves as candidates for honours ought to be restored to them, or, since that was
impossible, that that condition of life had better remain which they had followed when they
abstained from being candidates; that it was unjust that they, who had avoided all the
decorations of those honours, on account of the multitude of their dangers, should be deprived
of the kindness of the people, and yet not be free from the dangers of these new tribunals;
that a senator could not make this complaint, because he had originally offered himself as a
candidate for them, knowing all the conditions, and because he had a great many honourable
circumstances which in his case might lessen the inconvenience,—the place, the
authority, the dignity it gave him at home, the name and influence it conferred on him among
foreign nations, the toga praetexta, the curule chair, the
ensigns of the rank, the forces, the armies, the military command, the provinces, all which
things our ancestors wished to be the greatest rewards for virtuous actions, and by them they
wished, also, that there should be the greatest dangers held out, as a terror to offences.
They did not refuse to be prosecuted under this law, under which Habitus is now prosecuted,
which was then called the Sempronian law, and now is called the Cornelian law. For they were
aware that the equestrian order is not bound by that law; but they were anxious not to be
bound by any new law.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.