[67]
Are you, in making this defence, accusing those who are sitting on the bench, because they
think it right to regard justice rather than the letter of the law? And, while speaking on
this point, you mid that Scaevola had not succeeded in his case before the centumviri, whom I mentioned before on the occasion of his doing the same thing
which you are doing now, (though he had some reason for what he was doing, while you have
none,) still he did not succeed in any one's opinion in proving the point that be was
maintaining, because he appeared by his language to be opposing justice. I marvel that you
should have made this statement in this case, at an unfavourable time, and having an effect
exactly contrary to what your cause required; and it also appears strange to me that a
statement should often be advanced in courts of justice, and should be sometimes even defended
by able men, that one ought not to be always guided by lawyers, and that the civil law ought
not always to prevail in the decision of causes.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.