[74]
For what is the advantage of having a house or a
farm left one by one's father, or in any way legitimately acquired, if it be uncertain whether
you will be able to retain those things which are yours by every right of property? if law be
but little fortified? if nothing can be upheld by public and civil law, in opposition to the
influence of any powerful man? What is the advantage, I say, of having a farm, if all the laws
which have been most properly laid down by our ancestors about boundaries, about possession,
and water, and roads, may all be disturbed and changed in any manner? Believe me, every one of
you has received a greater inheritance in respect of his property, from justice and from the
laws than from those from whom he received the property itself. For it can happen, in
consequence of anybody's will, that a farm may come to me; but it cannot be ensured to me,
except by the civil law, that I shall be able to retain what has become my own. A farm can be
left me by my father, but the enjoyment of the farm—that is to say, freedom from all
anxiety and danger of law-suits—is not left to me by my father, but by the laws.
Aqueducts, supply of water, roads, a right of way, comes from my father, but the ratified
possession of all these things is derived from the civil law.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.