[71]
Now when he neither dares himself to allege any such cause for the tumult as being
true, nor even to invent such a falsehood, but when a most temperate man of his own
order, who at that time was in attendance on Caius Nero, Publius Tettius, says that
he too heard this same account at Lampsacus, (a man most accomplished in everything, Caius Varro, who was
at that time in Asia as military tribune,
says that be heard this very same story from Philodamus,) can you doubt that fortune
was willing, not so much to save him from that danger, as to reserve him for your
judgment! Unless, indeed, he will say, as indeed Hortensius did say, interrupting
Tettius while he was giving his evidence in the former pleading (at which time
indeed he gave plenty of proof that, if there were anything which he could say, he
could not keep silence; so that we may all feel sure that, while he was silent in
the other matters that were alleged, he was so because he had nothing to say); he at
that time said this, that Philodamus and his son had been condemned by Caius Nero.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.