[62]
That which,
in even the least offences and in the more trifling crimes, which are more frequent and
of almost daily occurrence, is asked most earnestly and as the very first question,
namely what motive there was for the offence; that Erucius does not think necessary to
be asked in a case of parricide. A charge which, O judges, even when many motives appear
to concur, and to be connected with one another, is still not rashly believed, nor is
such a case allowed to depend on slight conjecture, nor is any uncertain witness
listened to, nor is the matter decided by the ability of the accuser. Many crimes
previously committed must be proved, and a most profligate life on the part of the
prisoner, and singular audacity, and not only audacity, but the most extreme frenzy and
madness. When all these things are proved, still there must exist express traces of the
crime: where, in what manner, by whose means, and at what time the crime was committed.
And unless these proofs are numerous and evident—so wicked, so atrocious, so
nefarious a deed cannot be believed.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.