[122]
What, then, are we to think? Is Chrysogonus unwilling that these men shall be put to
the question for the sake of concealing his own crime? Not so, O judges; I do not think
that the same arguments apply to every one. As far as I am concerned, I have no
suspicion of the sort respecting Chrysogonus, and this is not the first time that it has
occurred to me to say so. You recollect that I so divided the cause at the beginning;
into the accusation, the whole arguing of which was entrusted to Erucius; and into
audacity, the business of which was assigned to the Roscii;—whatever crime,
whatever wickedness, whatever bloodshed there is, all that is the business of the
Roscii. We say that the excessive interest and power of Chrysogonus is a hindrance to
us, and can by no means be endured; and that it ought not only to be weakened, but even
to be punished by you, since you have the power given to you.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.