[
1295b]
[1]
In all states therefore there exist three divisions of the
state, the very rich, the very poor, and thirdly those who are between the two.
Since then it is admitted that what is moderate or in the middle is best, it is
manifest that the middle amount of all of the good things of fortune is the best
amount to possess. For this degree
of wealth is the readiest to obey reason, whereas for a person who is
exceedingly beautiful or strong or nobly born or rich, or the
opposite—exceedingly poor or weak or of very mean station, it is
difficult to follow the bidding of reason; for the former turn more to insolence
and grand wickedness, and the latter overmuch to malice and petty wickedness,
and the motive of all wrongdoing is either insolence or malice. And moreover the
middle class are the least inclined to shun office and to covet office,
1 and both these tendencies
are injurious to states. And in
addition to these points, those who have an excess of fortune's goods, strength,
wealth, friends and the like, are not willing to be governed and do not know how
to be (and they have acquired this quality even in their boyhood from
their homelife, which was so luxurious that they have not got used to submitting
to authority even in school), while those who are excessively in need
of these things are too humble. Hence the latter class do not know how to govern
but know how to submit to
[20]
government
of a servile kind, while the former class do not know how to submit to any
government, and only know how to govern in the manner of a master. The result is a state consisting of slaves
and masters, not of free men, and of one class envious and another contemptuous
of their fellows. This condition of affairs is very far removed from
friendliness, and from political partnership—for friendliness is an
element of partnership, since men are not willing to be partners with their
enemies even on a journey. But surely the ideal of the state is to consist as
much as possible of persons that are equal and alike, and this similarity is
most found in the middle classes; therefore the middle-class state will
necessarily be best constituted in respect of those elements
2 of
which we say that the state is by nature composed. And also this class of citizens have the greatest security
in the states; for they do not themselves covet other men's goods as do the
poor, nor do the other classes covet their substance as the poor covet that of
the rich; and because they are neither plotted against nor plotting they live
free from danger. Because of this it was a good prayer of Phocylides
3— “
In many things the middle have the best;
Be mine a middle station.
”
It is clear therefore also that the
political community administered by the middle class is the best, and that it is
possible for those states to be well governed that are of the kind in which the
middle class is numerous, and preferably stronger than both the other two
classes, or at all events than one of them, for by throwing in its weight it
sways the balance and prevents the opposite extremes
4
from coming into existence. Hence it is the greatest good fortune if the men
that have political power possess a moderate and sufficient substance,