[1269a]
[1]
as for example at Cyme there is
a law relating to trials for murder, that if the prosecutor on the charge of
murder produces a certain number of his own relatives as witnesses, the
defendant is guilty of the murder. And in general all men really seek what is
good, not what was customary with their forefathers; and it is probable that
primitive mankind, whether sprung from the earth1 or the survivors of some
destructive cataclysm,2 were
just like ordinary foolish people, as indeed is actually said of the earth-born
race, so that it is odd that we should abide by their notions. Moreover even
written codes of law may with advantage not be left unaltered. For just as in
the other arts as well, so with the structure of the state it is impossible that
it should have been framed aright in all its details; for it must of necessity
be couched in general terms, but our actions deal with particular things. These
considerations therefore make it clear that it is proper for some laws sometimes
to be altered. But if we consider
the matter in another way, it would seem to be a thing that needs much caution.
For when it is the case that the improvement would be small, but it is a bad
thing to accustom men to repeal the laws lightly, it is clear that some mistakes
both of the legislator and of the magistrate should be passed over; for the
people will not be as much benefited by making an alteration as they will be
harmed by becoming accustomed to distrust their rulers. Also, the example from the case of the arts is a
mistake,
[20]
as to change the practice
of an art is a different thing from altering a law; for the law has no power to
compel obedience beside the force of custom, and custom only grows up in long
lapse of time, so that lightly to change from the existing laws to other new
laws is to weaken the power of the law. Again, even if alteration of the laws is
proper, are all the laws to be open to alteration, and in every form of
constitution, or not? and is any chance person to be competent to introduce
alterations or only certain people? for there is a great difference between
these alternatives. Therefore let us abandon this inquiry for the present, since
it belongs to other occasions.On the subject of the constitution of
Sparta and that of Crete, and virtually in regard to the other
forms of constitution also, the questions that arise for consideration are two,
one whether their legal structure has any feature that is admirable or the
reverse in comparison with the best system, another whether it contains any
provision that is really opposed to the fundamental principle and character of
the constitution that the founders had in view.Now it is a thing admitted
that a state that is to be well governed must be provided with leisure from
menial occupations; but how this is to be provided it is not easy to ascertain.
The serf class in Thessaly repeatedly
rose against its masters, and so did the Helots at Sparta, where they are like an enemy
constantly sitting in wait for the disasters of the Spartiates. Nothing of the kind has hitherto occurred
in Crete, the reason perhaps being that
the neighboring cities,
1 So Hes. WD 108, Pind. N. 6.1.
2 So Plat. Laws 676 ff., Plat. Tim. 22 ff. Aristotle believed that man had existed for ever, and that the world had experienced only local cataclysms.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.