[1000b]
[1]
for if there had not been Strife in
things, all things would have been one, he says; for when they came
together "then Strife came to stand outermost."1 Hence it follows on his theory that God, the
most blessed being, is less wise than the others, since He does not
know all the elements; for He has no Strife in Him, and knowledge is
of like by like:By earth (he says) we earth perceive,
by water water,By air bright air, by
fire consuming fire,Love too by love,
and strife by grievous strife.2But—and this is the point from which we
started—thus much is clear: that it follows on his theory
that Strife is no more the cause of destruction than it is of Being.
Nor, similarly, is Love the cause of Being; for in combining things
into one it destroys everything else.3Moreover, of the actual process of change he gives no explanation,
except that it is so by nature:But when
Strife waxing great among the members4Sprang up to honor as the time came roundAppointed them in turn by a mighty
oath,5as though change
were a necessity; but he exhibits no cause for the
necessity.However,
thus much of his theory is consistent: he does not represent some
things to be perishable and others imperishable, but makes
everything
[20]
perishable
except the elements. But the difficulty now being stated is why some
things are perishable and others not, assuming that they are derived
from the same principles.The foregoing
remarks may suffice to show that the principles cannot be the
same.If however
they are different, one difficulty is whether they too are to be
regarded as imperishable or as perishable. For if they are perishable,
it is clearly necessary that they too must be derived from something
else, since everything passes upon dissolution into that from which it
is derived. Hence it follows that there are other principles prior to
the first principles;but
this is impossible, whether the series stops or proceeds to infinity.
And further, how can perishable things exist if their principles are
abolished? On the other hand if the principles are imperishable, why
should some imperishable principles produce perishable things, and
others imperishable things? This is not reasonable; either it is
impossible or it requires much explanation.Further, no one has so much as attempted to
maintain different principles; they maintain the same principles for
everything.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.