This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
View text chunked by:
- bekker page : bekker line
- book : chapter : section
that it is because the one party is in the position of a debtor and the other of a
creditor; just as therefore in the case of a loan, whereas the borrower would be glad to
have his creditor out of the way, the lender actually watches over his debtor's safety, so
it is thought that the conferrer of a benefit wishes the recipient to live in order that
he may receive a return, but the recipient is not particularly anxious to make a return.
Epicharmus no doubt would say that people who give this explanation are ‘looking
at the seamy side’1 of life; but all the same it appears to be not untrue to
human nature, for most men have short memories, and are more desirous of receiving
benefits than of bestowing them.
[2]
But it might be held that the real reason lies deeper,2 and that the case of the creditor is not really a parallel. With him
it is not a matter of affection, but only of wishing his debtor's preservation for the
sake of recovering his money; whereas a benefactor feels friendship and affection for the
recipient of his bounty even though he is not getting anything out of him and is never
likely to do so.
[3]
The same thing happens with the artist: every artist loves his own handiwork more than
that handiwork if it were to come to life would love him.