This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
View text chunked by:
- bekker page : bekker line
- book : chapter : section
of the perversions, for it is only a very small deviation from the
constitutional form of government.1 These are the commonest ways in which revolutions occur in states,
since they involve the smallest change, and come about most easily.
[4]
One may find likenesses and so to speak models of these various forms of constitution in
the household. The relationship of father to sons is regal in type, since a father's first
care is for his children's welfare. This is why Homer styles Zeus
‘father,’ for the ideal of kingship is paternal government. Among the
Persians paternal rule is tyrannical, for the Persians use their sons as slaves. The
relation of master to slaves is also tyrannic, since in it the master's interest is aimed
at. The autocracy of a master appears to be right, that of the Persian father wrong; for
different subjects should be under different forms of rule.
[5]
The relation of husband to wife seems to be in the nature of an
aristocracy: the husband rules in virtue of fitness, and in matters that belong to a man's
sphere; matters suited to a woman he hands over to his wife. When the husband controls
everything, he transforms the relationship into an oligarchy, for he governs in violation
of fitness, and not in virtue of superiority.
1 i.e., timocracy: see 10.1 fin.