This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
View text chunked by:
- bekker page : bekker line
- book : chapter : section
the man who has lost all principle, profligate.
[5]
But there is a person who abandons his choice, against right principle,
under the influence of passion, who is mastered by passion sufficiently for him not to act
in accordance with right principle, but not so completely as to be of such a character as
to believe that the reckless pursuit of pleasure is right. This is the unrestrained man:
he is better than the profligate, and not absolutely bad, for in him the highest part of
man, the fundamental principle, is still preserved. Opposed to the unrestrained man is
another, who stands firm by his choice, and does not abandon it under the mere impulse of
passion.
It is clear then from these considerations that Self-restraint is a good quality and
Unrestraint a bad one.9.
Is then a man self-restrained if he stands by a principle or choice of any sort, or must
it be the right choice? and is a man unrestrained if he fails to stand by a choice or
principle of any sort, or only if he fails to stand by the true principle and the right
choice? This difficulty was raised before.1
Perhaps the answer is, that though accidentally it may be any principle or choice,
essentially it is the true principle and the right choice that the one stands by and the
other does not; in the sense that if a man chooses or pursues b as a means to
a,
1 2.7.