This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
[1231a]
[1]
e.g.
harmonious sound, or beauty; for clearly they are not affected in any
degree worth speaking of by the mere sight of beautiful objects or by
listening to musical sounds, except possibly in the case of some
miraculous occurrences. Nor yet are they sensitive to good or bad
smells, although it is true that all their senses are keener than
man's; but even the
smells they enjoy are those that have agreeable associations, and are
not intrinsically agreeable. By smells not intrinsically agreeable I
mean those that we enjoy because of either anticipation or
recollection, for example the smell of things to eat or drink, for we
enjoy these scents on account of a different pleasure, that of eating
or drinking; by intrinsically agreeable I mean scents such as those of
flowers (this is the reason of Stratonicus's1 neat remark that the scent of
flowers is beautiful but that of things to eat and drink sweet).
For even the
pleasures of taste are not all attractive to animals, nor are those
perceived with the tip of the tongue, but those perceived by the
throat, the sensation of which seems more like touch than taste; so
that gourmands do not pray that they may have a long tongue but a
crane's gullet, like Philoxenus son of Eryxis.2 It
follows that broadly speaking profligacy must be considered to be
related to the objects of touch, and likewise it is with pleasures of
that sort that the profligate is concerned;
[20]
for tippling and gluttony and lechery and
gormandizing and the like all have to do with the sensations
specified, and these are the departments into which profligacy is
divided. But nobody is
called profligate if he exceeds in regard to the pleasures of sight or
hearing or smell; those errors we criticize without severe rebuke, and
generally all the things included under the term 'lack of
self-control': the uncontrolled are not profligate, yet they are not
temperate.Therefore the person of such a
character as to be deficient in all the enjoyments which practically
everybody must share and must enjoy, is insensitive (or whatever the
proper term is), and he that exceeds in them is profligate. For all people by nature
enjoy these things, and conceive desires for them, without being or
being called profligate, for they do not exceed by feeling more joy
than they ought when they get them nor more pain than they ought when
they do not get them; nor yet are they unfeeling,3 for they do not
fall short in feeling joy or pain, but rather exceed.And since there are excess and deficiency in regard to these things,
it is clear that there is also a middle state, and that this state of
character is the best one, and is the opposite of both the others.
Hence if temperance is the best state of character in relation to the
things with which the profligate is concerned, the middle state in
regard to the pleasant objects of sense mentioned will be Temperance,
being a middle state between profligacy and insensitiveness: the
excess will be Profligacy,
1 A contemporary musician, a number of whose smart sayings are recorded by Athenaeus 8.347f-352d.
2 Mr. Hospitable, son of Mistress Belch—presumably a character in comedy.
3 ἀνάλγητοι is thrown in as a possible synonym for ἀναίσθητοι, see 15.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.