[545a]
“We have.” “Must
we not, then, next after this, survey the inferior types, the man who is
contentious and covetous of honor,1 corresponding
to the Laconian constitution, and the oligarchical man in turn, and the
democratic and the tyrant, in order that,2 after observing the most unjust of
all, we may oppose him to the most just, and complete our inquiry as to the
relation of pure justice and pure injustice in respect of the happiness and
unhappiness of the possessor, so that we may either follow the counsel of
Thrasymachus and pursue injustice
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.