[450a]
Socrates
Now, does the medical art, which we mentioned just now, make men able to understand and speak about the sick?Gorgias
It must.Socrates
Hence the medical art also, it seems, is concerned with speech.Gorgias
Yes.Socrates
That is, speech about diseases?Gorgias
Certainly.Socrates
Now, is gymnastic also concerned with speech about the good and bad condition of our bodies?Gorgias
Quite so.Socrates
And moreover it is the same, Gorgias, with all the other arts; [450b] each of them is concerned with that kind of speech which deals with the subject matter of that particular art.Gorgias
Apparently.Socrates
Then why, pray, do you not give the name “rhetorical” to those other arts, when they are concerned with speech, if you call that “rhetoric” which has to do with speech?Gorgias
Because, Socrates, the skill in those other arts is almost wholly concerned with manual work and similar activities, whereas in rhetoric there is no such manual working, but its whole activity [450c] and efficacy is by means of speech. For this reason I claim for the rhetorical art that it is concerned with speech, and it is a correct description, I maintain.Socrates
Now, do I understand what sort of art you choose to call it? Perhaps, however, I shall get to know this more clearly. But answer me this: we have arts, have we not?Gorgias
Yes.Socrates
Then amongst the various arts some, I take it, consist mainly of work, and so require but brief speech; while others require none, for the art's object may be achieved actually in silence, [450d] as with painting, sculpture, and many other arts. It is to such as these that I understand you to refer when you say rhetoric has no concern with them; is not that so?Gorgias
Your supposition is quite correct, Socrates.Socrates
But there is another class of arts which achieve their whole purpose through speech and—to put it roughly—require either no action to aid them, or very little; for example, numeration, calculation, geometry, draught-playing, and many other arts: some of these have the speech in about equal proportion to the action, but most have it as the larger part, or absolutely the whole of their operation and effect is by means of speech. It is one of this class of arts [450e] that I think you refer to as rhetoric.Gorgias
You are right.Socrates
But, mind you, I do not think it is any one of these that you mean to call rhetoric; though, so far as your expression went, you did say that the art which has its effect through speech is rhetoric, and one might retort, if one cared to strain at mere words: So, Gorgias, you call numeration rhetoric! But I do not believe it is either numeration or geometry that you call rhetoric.
Now, does the medical art, which we mentioned just now, make men able to understand and speak about the sick?Gorgias
It must.Socrates
Hence the medical art also, it seems, is concerned with speech.Gorgias
Yes.Socrates
That is, speech about diseases?Gorgias
Certainly.Socrates
Now, is gymnastic also concerned with speech about the good and bad condition of our bodies?Gorgias
Quite so.Socrates
And moreover it is the same, Gorgias, with all the other arts; [450b] each of them is concerned with that kind of speech which deals with the subject matter of that particular art.Gorgias
Apparently.Socrates
Then why, pray, do you not give the name “rhetorical” to those other arts, when they are concerned with speech, if you call that “rhetoric” which has to do with speech?Gorgias
Because, Socrates, the skill in those other arts is almost wholly concerned with manual work and similar activities, whereas in rhetoric there is no such manual working, but its whole activity [450c] and efficacy is by means of speech. For this reason I claim for the rhetorical art that it is concerned with speech, and it is a correct description, I maintain.Socrates
Now, do I understand what sort of art you choose to call it? Perhaps, however, I shall get to know this more clearly. But answer me this: we have arts, have we not?Gorgias
Yes.Socrates
Then amongst the various arts some, I take it, consist mainly of work, and so require but brief speech; while others require none, for the art's object may be achieved actually in silence, [450d] as with painting, sculpture, and many other arts. It is to such as these that I understand you to refer when you say rhetoric has no concern with them; is not that so?Gorgias
Your supposition is quite correct, Socrates.Socrates
But there is another class of arts which achieve their whole purpose through speech and—to put it roughly—require either no action to aid them, or very little; for example, numeration, calculation, geometry, draught-playing, and many other arts: some of these have the speech in about equal proportion to the action, but most have it as the larger part, or absolutely the whole of their operation and effect is by means of speech. It is one of this class of arts [450e] that I think you refer to as rhetoric.Gorgias
You are right.Socrates
But, mind you, I do not think it is any one of these that you mean to call rhetoric; though, so far as your expression went, you did say that the art which has its effect through speech is rhetoric, and one might retort, if one cared to strain at mere words: So, Gorgias, you call numeration rhetoric! But I do not believe it is either numeration or geometry that you call rhetoric.
