[27]
Stop reading.
This Aristonoê, men of the jury, is the daughter of Philostratus and
mother of Phaenippus. He declares that a debt is owing to her for her marriage
portion, but of this the laws make him the owner.1 His statement
is therefore false, and he does not make a just declaration. For why is it that
I, Phaenippus, while my mother—who brought with her a marriage
portion—is living and dwelling in my house, do not declare the
marriage portion as a debt due to her, and thus try to lead the jurymen astray,
but permit her to share in all that I have, alike whether it shall prove to be
the estate of Phaenippus or my own? Because the laws so command, my good Sir.
But all that you do is contrary to the laws. Read on.“
Declaration
”
1 After the death of her husband a woman might return to the house of her κύριος（nearest male relative）, or, if there were children, she might live with them in her husband's house. In this case the marriage portion became the property of her son. In return he was bound to give his mother maintenance, but the portion could not be counted a lien upon his property.
Demosthenes. Demosthenes with an English translation by A. T. Murray, Ph.D., LL.D. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd. 1939.
The Annenberg CPB/Project provided support for entering this text.
Purchase a copy of this text (not necessarily the same edition) from Amazon.com
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.