[10]
whereas, if he attacked an answer given, he thought
that as he had made an admission before, so now it would be in his power to make
a denial.1 That is the
reason why he attacks the testimony of this witness, the truth of whose
testimony I mean to prove conclusively to you all, not on the basis of
probabilities, or of arguments made up to fit the occasion, but by reasoning
which, I am sure, will approve itself to you all as just and fair. Listen, and
judge.
1 That is, in attacking the testimony of the deponent he would deny his own previous admissions.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.